First, I'll start off with a little background from each of the movies....
Goodfellas was the first of the three movies that I watched. I had high expectations since I had heard a lot about it and since it was nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars in 1991. Ray Liotta plays Henry Hill, who works with his gangster friends (including Robert De Niro as James
Conway and Joe Pesci as Tommy DeVito) to move up in the Mob hierarchy in New York. This film is an adaptation of Wiseguys, a non-fiction book written in 1986. The thing that I noticed first about this movie was the use of narration. The first fifteen minutes after the opening scene were narrated by Henry Hill as the viewer watched him grow up and live his dream of being a gangster. Music is used in a big way throughout the film. More than 35 different songs were used throughout! This made the film more exciting to watch and gave more information about the time period in which it was set. The camera work was very distinctive and unlike anything I had seen before. Often times during this movie at the peak of intense moments a freeze frame would be used while narration was going on over it. I noticed that the camera does a lot of panning and weaving throughout the movie, which I came to realize-after watching the other two movies-that this type of camera-work is typical of Scorsese films.
Gangs of New York, the second movie I watched, surprised me a little because it was very different from the rawness of Goodfellas and wasn't what I was expecting at all. It was quirkier and altogether a pretty weird movie and I was surprised to read that it was one that Scorsese had been working on for a while-it was somewhat of a passion project for him. This movie
centers around Amsterdam Vallon (Leonardo DiCaprio) who seeks revenge against the man who killed his father many years ago in a gang fight in the Five Points district of New York. Once again, music was a big part of this movie, however, the type of music differed from what was played in Goodfellas. In Gangs of New York most of the music that was used was instrumental, such as beating drums or bagpipes. One scene that was made even more weird by the music was the huge gang fight near the beginning of the movie in which Vallon's dad was killed. The music didn't sound like it should have been playing during a fight scene, which made for a weird juxtaposition. Another scene in which music is used in an interesting way is also near the beginning when a character in Vallon's gang kicks down a door revealing a snowy New York and the beating drums in the background abruptly stop. This created a disorienting scene that made it feel like something else unexpected was going to happen. Also like Goodfellas, narration plays a part in this movie. A lot of it is narrated by the main character, Amsterdam Vallon. The use of narration in this movie is interesting because most of the time Vallon is a pretty quiet character, so the narration lets the viewer get into his head a little more.

The main theme that I wanted to explore in depth for this study is Scorsese's camera work. The cinematography is very distinctive and makes these movies so much more interesting and exciting to watch. In each movie I noticed that Scorsese favors tracking shots in which he follows (usually from behind) his subject for a significant length of time. A great example of this shot is in Goodfellas, when Henry Hill and his date are being followed through a nightclub scene to a dining table (see video below for the infamous Copacabana nightclub tracking shot).
Another very important theme that connected these three movies was the use of music and sound. In all of these movies there was hardly a time where there was no music or sounds playing in the background. In Goodfellas, this music served to set the stage and make the movie more exciting to watch. As for Taxi Driver, the more instrumental music exemplified Travis's loneliness in the busy cities of New York. The music of Gangs of New York intensified battle scenes and created for interesting juxtapositions in some scenes. Narration was also an important aspect in each of these movies. It served to let the viewer into the character's head when there was no other way in. How else would we witness any better the descent into violent madness that De Niro's character experiences in Taxi Driver? Henry Hill narrating his own childhood made for an interesting introduction to Goodfellas. And in Gangs of New York, narration added yet another layer to the complexity of everything that was going on throughout the movie.
According to Box Office Mojo, Taxi Driver, Gangs of New York, and Goodfellas are the seventh, eighth, and ninth top earners of (adjusted) gross income for Scorsese's films, respectively (http://www.boxofficemojo.com/people/chart/ view=Director&id=martinscorsese.htm&sort=opengross&order=DESC&p=.htm). It's interesting that these three are all right next to each other in the chart, considering Scorsese has directed over twenty films. Seeing these movies has given me a good idea of what a Scorsese film is like, and left me wanting to see more of his work. This study has allowed me to see how much influence a director has on a movie. There are obvious parallels between the three movies I watched, such as cinematography and sound, which label them as Scorsese movies. I now better understand how a director's style can impact a movie. In terms of style, Martin Scorsese's distinct cinematography and use of sound have left me loving what I have seen from him and wanting to see more.
Really nice job here. Excellent, detailed work describing the things that cut across all of Scorsese's films that you watched. I agree with you in all of your points--his camera moves a lot, and he creates a complex soundscape. The more I see Taxi Driver, the more I appreciate the oddness of it, and the interesting social statements Scorsese seems to make about our society, veterans, alienation, violence, good and evil, etc. I hope you do see more of his films--maybe a future MYST? Good work!
ReplyDelete